Shocking and disgusting is in the eye of the beholder ... and the controller

I see that  IranContraScumDid911's main youtube channel has been suspended for 2 weeks for a 9/11 video deemed too shocking and disgusting.

Shocking is a now relative reaction that's being genetically modified out of our consciousness  but disgusting still holds some sway in our collective semi-awareness.

What little disgust there still is about 9/11 is misdirected by the 10th anniversary media blitz toward everything but the truth.

Surprising, almost shocking, is that Fox News is airing live the boss's corruption hearing apparently without commercial interruption. Good for a ratings jump the Murdochs (Morlocks?) must have decided.  The first words scrolling across the screen was from Sir Rupert, "I was misled." That's pretty funny coming from someone whose sole purpose is to mislead people. I think I read son James' lips whispering to daddy "if Casey can walk, so can we."



The houses of prostitution in competition with the News Corpse empire must be salivating. Disgusting behavior they'll be saying although I would think they are somewhat worried about their own skeletons in the closet that are rattling around  and making too much noise for comfort. The Murdochs may be the worst of the worst but only by a few degrees.

It's probably too much to ask to turn off their channels. We're too titillated by what disgusts but there is one thing we can do. Don't buy anything they advertise. Cut off the income.We don't need a thing they have to sell ... including the lies they call 'the news.'

Murdoch and 7/7

larger image

The sixth anniversary of the false flag of London, 7/7,  becomes the day that the Rupert Murdoch crime syndicate gets a slap in  face and shuts down one of their 'flagship' mind control rags for the masses to try and save themselves some trouble. Hacking the phones of the the 'bereaved relatives of the victims of 7/7'  is only the tip of the iceberg.


Coincidence? Karma? Theater? Maybe the numbers have meaning?


Murdoch has said allegations News Of The World staff hacked phones and paid police were "deplorable and unacceptable".

Note to Rupert: Deplorable is what you are.  It's what you pay your employees to be. It's what you are paid to be. They sad part is that some people actually buy your trash and call it news. But a few less buy it today than they did yesterday.

The empire of lies is falling ... one piece at a time. That's good news.

Reasonable Doubt

The show's main attraction is over. Only the psycho sideshow of the media remain. Roll up the big top ... Cayce Anthony is not guilty of murder.

This very effective diversion  nears an end and the country waits for the next.




The rule of law requires that in any criminal case the burden of proof beyond any reasonable doubt is the responsibility of the prosecution. That's our constitutional right. Our rights were set in stone for a reason. It gives the innocent a chance in an open honest court to not be unfairly convicted. Sometimes it allows the guilty to walk. The process will never be perfect. 

The Cacye/Caylee case seems to be a perfect example of a peer review that came to a logical conclusion in the absence of hard proof.  Innuendo and conjecture is not evidence. To paraphrase Johnnie Cochran, "if it's not beyond reasonable doubt, you must let her out." So they did.

Lawyers are often portrayed as snakes and yeah, some do leave a slime trail. It's only when we personally know them or need a fighter on our side that we think otherwise. Sometimes they are necessary evils in this strange world.  It's all about winning and the winners smile and celebrate.

As tragic as the death of this little girl is, Orange County said today they have 11 other child death cases they have to deal with. We'll never hear about them. Those stories and trials won't have good monetary and social engineering value, they won't be sexy enough.

The media whores and their bobble head lawyer expert opinion talkers were made slobbering fools. Poor actors in their houses of ill repute.  The defense team had a press conference and attorney Cheney Mason blasted out at "the disgusting  lawyers, the incompetent talking heads who get on television and talk about cases they don't know a damn thing about." Go to around 1:06 in this video for his full statement. It's good theater. 


It's been reported that Orange County spent over $1 million on this case.  Roger Clemens goes on trial tomorrow for lying to Congress just in time for a new ratings sweep. This is where our 'justice' money goes.


Meanwhile a great number of criminals walk the street or hide in their homes without a dime of our taxpayer money being spent to investigate them. The 9/11 perps, the liars and murders who took us to war, the criminal bankers who are in the process of stealing everything we have are still on a free ride. So are their media enablers.

We're waiting on those trials of treason and 1st degree murder and war crimes and we expect the honest execution of the rule of law. We'll watch and be pulling for the prosecution and for them to prove beyond a responsible doubt.  We may even have a festival on the courthouse steps when they read the guilty verdicts and it's our time to celebrate. No doubt.

When CNN Comes to Town

CNN and Soledad O'Brien once again puts Murfreesboro Tennessee in the spotlight with more on the mosque debate/diversion/psyops with a Sunday night, March 27 showing of  "Unwelcome: The Muslims Next Door."  

"We focused on both sides," said CNN's Soledad. 

I doubt that Soledad will put very much focus on who funded the court action against building the mosque. Connecting the dots in this divide and conquer saga reveals zionist necon manipulations. Frank Gaffney and the Center for Security Policy played a role. 'Christian' zionist groups chipped in. I'm sure other zionist led organizations had a hidden hand in the money and maneuverings but kept a very low profile. The mosque opposition lawyers refused to talk about who is paying them.

CNN even has an "educator and student guide" with before and after viewing discussion questions. No questions though on how this story is a classic example of social engineering and manufactured enemies for neverending war.

In her interviews with the duped and disturbed mosque and Muslim opponents, Soledad  passed on the opportunity to ask them these questions ...

Don't you folks know that 9/11 was a false flag orchestrated by criminal elements of the U.S. government and the Israeli Mossad with great assistance from all of the main stream media in the deception and cover-up, including my very own CNN? Why can't you understand that it wasn't Muslims that attacked us, that it was an 'inside job?' Doesn't that make your Islamophobia and mosque opposition a moot point?

Soledad likes her job so she won't deviate from the official line  Contrived sensationalism sells. It's what Soledad and CNN do.

More background on the Murfreesboro mosque story.

-------------

The complete CNN video ... part 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4

Kill Teams and Anti-War Kooks

Spiegel Online report on "The Kill Team"



'Trophy' photos from Afghanistan are very similar to those the redneck hunters take to show off their deer kill.

No surprises here. Soldiers brainwashed to see their 'kills' as sub-human or animals will continue the war crimes as long as we send them to criminal wars.

Apologists are already saying that the release of 3 photos out of close to 4,000 photos and videos that Spiegel 'obtained' will harm the war cause. All we can say is "we hope so."

Spiegel is a partner with Wikileaks so no telling what kind of psyops game is going on. Who benefits from these photo leaks? Spiegel is certainly not doing this as an anti-war statement.

Speaking of anti-war, I was going through the radio channels today seeing what was being said about Libya and ran into one of our local neocon war whore talking heads who used the words "anti-war kooks" a least 10 times in about a 20 minute segment. That would many of us he's talking about. Those who don't go along with the program of kill them over there before they kill us here.

I'm sort of proud to be a kook.

And now back to our regularly scheduled dangerous vitriolic rhetoric

It seems like the terms vitriol and vitriolic have been used more in the last 3 days than in the rest of history combined. Perhaps that's an exaggeration but you know the media, once a word catches on it is used repetitively until we're sick of it. Sort of like anti-semetism.

Everyone with a political axe to grind or a propaganda angle to push is trying to make use of the Gabrielle Giffords mass shooting. Blame this one or that, words incite, words can kill. We've heard it all before but this event really gives an opportunity to push the envelope for censorship and more. In the end this is not about quieting the controlled left/right politicians, their media shills and misguided followers. It is about shutting us up ... you and I.

Already there's a call to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.

Just how specific would that law be and who would have the say so on what inciting violence is? Would violence actually have to occur or would this be more in the realm of 'thought crime?'

Would calling Joe Lieberman a traitor, Lindsey Graham a war whore or questioning that a majority of Congress are controlled or blackmailed by AIPAC, Wall Street and the mega-corporations be inciting? How about saying that the entire Congress and many federal officials are complicit in covering up the 9/11 black op? It could be dangerous just talking about how the Congress and federal officials have blood on their hands for allowing the lying wars to continue or how they get on their knees waving tons of money before Israel and supporting the genocide and land theft of Palestine. Words could trigger loons to act and it would be all your fault.

Mostly it's about inciting fear. Fear to speak out. Fear to call those in power the applicable names they so well deserve. Fear to try and expose the criminal activities in government.

It's not about the "in the crosshairs" symbols of Sara Palin. It's about the symbolism of "we" who are dangerous because we ask the questions.

The traitor of the day award goes to Glenn Beck who amazingly uses the Giffords incident to lead into how he's always been right and who is number one on his list of people with dangerous thoughts ... truthers.

Yes, number 1 in his "A Recipe for Danger."

"I have told you on this program that we are facing a danger and I, on this program, have highlighted certain things. I've told you that there are people out there that I think are dangerous that actually believe that 9/11 was an inside job and that George Bush was responsible for wiring it up and blowing up the world trade center. I think some of those people are nuts.


I think some of them are dangerous.


I have told you that the government would so discredit themselves that those things would start to make more and more sense and people would say, you know what, I don't even know if I believe in the moon landing anymore."

I was surprised that Beck didn't equate truthers with holocaust deniers but he did throw in these other gems; "He {Jared Loughner} thinks George Bush was behind 9/11,"   "19 hijackers who took down the world trade center in the name of Allah,"   "My agenda is the truth."

transparent bullshit ...

vitriolic rhetoric ...

It makes you want to get up and smack the TV.

And now a commercial break from our Israel first sales force

There's nothing ground breaking in the following zionist commercial disguised as a 'news' show. Christian Zionist fake American Mike Huckabee sucks up to who he is predicting will be a future Israeli prime minister, Knesset member Danny Danon. Both puke up the disgusting meme of Israel's 'right' to steal land and that Iran is the real enemy that must be dealt with.

The wannabe be U.S. president for Israel then brings on Sue Myrick, a so called congressional member who promotes the notion that Hezbollah is in league with the Mexican drug cartels and that we should pull out all the stops to keep them from eventually blowing us up.

Oh yeah, Alex Jones is also on the Hezbollah/Mexico bandwagon. Huckabee and Jones both sing from the same Israeli hymnal.

They Live

I finally saw the 1988 movie "They Live" today and realized what Peter Chamberlin is saying with his blog title "There Are No Sunglasses."

I also saw a little of the Stewart and Colbert sanity/fear rally and you don't need the sunglasses to see through it.

The lefty counterpoint to the righty Glenn Beck hijacked Tea Party types. The lefties may be a little more fun but no less propagandizing.

It's breaking us down into two groups that oppose each other as if that's all there is.

But most of us don't actually fit into this false duplicity. We're the ones who don't like Stewart and Obama, Beck and Palin. Using conventional terms we as individuals are a mix of conservative, liberal, moderate, radical or what ever you want to call it. Sort of 'mongrels' that don't fit what the media wants us to be.

A real rally for America would be anti-war, anti-imperialism and most definitely anti-criminal government and anti-wall street/banker syndicate. Basically it would be looking for the truth wherever it leads us. We haven't seen much of that in these controlled for TV gatherings.

Rallies have always been used to manipulate the masses. The crowd cheers "hooray for us" and goes home satiated. A lot of good people want to be involved, a lot of good people fall for the deceptions.

Some of the signs at the insanity rally were witty and funny and the Huffington Press had a ton of reader submitted entries but one sign stuck out. Stewart's already used it but Arianna's bunch just had to get it in there one more time.

'There are no sunglasses' but we still can see behind the mask and we know what the monsters fear the most ... that crazy little thing called truth.

Who am I shilling for? Sometimes it's hard to keep straight.

 NPR .... Fox .....


What difference does it make as long as they pay me?

NPR News has terminated the contract of longtime news analyst Juan Williams after remarks he made on the Fox News Channel about Muslims.

Williams responded: "Look, Bill, I'm not a bigot. You know the kind of books I've written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."

Serving two opposing propaganda outlets doesn't work.  Williams never had anything worthwhile to say anyway.

He never discusses or questions the real issues. How about this one?

9/11 Get Out Of The Area The Second Tower Is Coming Down!

 

Tripping with Al-Qaeda

For 9/11 week, HBO will premier Lawrence Wright's documentary exploration of modern terrorism "My Trip to Al-Qaeda."

Wright of course is an elitist shill for the 'official' tale of Al-Qaeda, radial Islam and 9/11 and the author of The Looming Tower : Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11.

Not having HBO I will probably never see this documentary and that's actually a good thing. No doubt it will be full of the same old lies that we have become accustomed to.

But it's interesting that sometimes in interviews even the best of the propaganda masters let things slip out that give insight to certain people and events.

NPR in promoting Wright and HBO's agenda had an interview with him where he had this to say about Osama Bin Laden's brother in law Jamal Khalifa.

TERRY GROSS: So, one of your best sources was bin Laden's brother-in-law, the late Jamal Khalifa. He was murdered or assassinated. And you say he understood bin Laden better than anyone. He had married bin Laden's favorite sister. What are some of the insights you got about bin Laden from talking to his brother-in-law?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, Jamal Khalifa was a delightful person. He had a wonderful, light sense of humor. He was always kidding. But at the same time, he was very earnest. And, you know, he had fought in the jihad with bin Laden. He was a high school teacher. You know, he had a very charismatic way about him.

And all these likeable qualities made me realize why bin Laden liked him. And in a way, through my own response to Jamal Khalifa, I could sort of identify an element of bin Laden's personality that actually it was a little uncomfortable to me because I could see the human side of al-Qaida. I could see why people might be drawn to bin Laden because of the nature of his friend.

GROSS: Did he defend jihad to you?

Mr. WRIGHT: He defended jihad against the Soviets. But he, not only to me but publicly, distanced himself from bin Laden, and he actually asked me if he could talk to the FBI to clear his name. And I said I knew a lot of FBI agents, and I would try to set that up.

So I did try and tried for actually several years. And I was finally told by a source that the FBI was forbidden by the CIA to actually make that contact with Jamal.

GROSS: Which side do you think killed him?

Mr. WRIGHT: Well, his family thinks that U.S. Special Operations killed him, and I don't know that that's true. But nobody was arrested in that killing, and it was ostensibly a robbery, but all that was taken were his computers.{more}

So if what Wright says here is true, it seems as if Jamal was a CIA asset long after the Afgan-Soviet war, just like Osama was. The CIA couldn't have Jamal talking to the FBI. It might jeopardize their hidden operations so they killed him.

Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law, killed in Madagascar

"Khalifa was arrested in America, in Jordan, and after 9/11, in Saudi Arabia, and on each occasion was eventually released."

aangirfan: A History of Al Qaeda

Alex Jones allows ABC's Nightline to negatively portray the truth movement as "Paranoia Porn"

It's said that there's no bad publicity and that may be true for AJ and his followers but for those others trying to sanely educate their friends and neighbors to the 'conspiracies' of the world that are destroying us, being portrayed as whacked out nuts doesn't help.

I doubt that Nightline would do a show with someone calm and collected such as Dr. David Ray Griffin on the subject of 9/11. That might give credibility to the movement and the media doesn't want that.

Jones knew that inviting the MSM to do a nationally televised feature on him would result in a hit piece.

Why did he go ahead and do it?

Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed

Institute for Research on Middle Eastern Policy

Declassified Senate investigation Files Reveal Clandestine Israeli PR Campaign in America

WASHINGTON, Aug. 18 -- Declassified files from a Senate investigation into Israeli-funded covert public relations and lobbying activity in the United States were released by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) on July 23rd, 2010. The subpoenaed documents reveal Israel's clandestine programs for "cultivation of editors," the "stimulation and placement of suitable articles in the major consumer magazines" as well as U.S. reporting about sensitive subjects such as the Dimona nuclear weapons facility.

Documents are now available for download from http://IRmep.org/ila/azc include:

Dimona (excerpt): "The nuclear reactor story inspired comment from many sources; editorial writers, columnists, science writers and cartoonists. Most of the press seemed finally to accept the thesis that the reactor was being built for peaceful purposes and not for bombs." http://www.irmep.org/11-121960AZC.pdf

Content placement and promotion (excerpt): "The Atlantic Monthly in its October issue carried the outstanding Martha Gellhorn piece on the Arab refugees, which made quite an impact around the country. We arranged for the distribution of 10,000 reprints to public opinion molders in all categories… Interested friends are making arrangements with the Atlantic for another reprint of the Gellhorn article to be sent to all 53,000 persons whose names appear in Who's Who in America…Our Committee is now planning articles for the women's magazines for the trade and business publications." http://www.irmep.org/09101961AZC.pdf

Pressure campaigns (excerpt): "It can be said that the press of the nation…has by and large shown sympathy and understanding of Israel's position. There are, of course, exceptions, notably the Scripps-Howard chain where we still need to achieve a 'break-through,' the Pulliam chain (where some progress has been made) and some locally-owned papers." http://www.irmep.org/11-121960AZC.pdf

Magazine Committee achievements (excerpt): "We cannot pinpoint all that has already been accomplished by this Committee except to say that it has been responsible for the writing and placement of articles on Israel in some of America's leading magazines...." http://www.IRmep.org/10301962_AZC.pdf

According to Grant F. Smith, director of IRmep, "It is frightening how easily some in the American news media surrendered to a foreign public relations campaign that spent the 2010 equivalent of $36 million over two years. Time has proven most of the planted content to be misleading, if not dangerous. These historical documents hold many important lessons for Americans who have long needed—but rarely received—straight reporting on key Middle East issues."

The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is the nation's record keeper. It retains 1%-3% of the most important documents of business conducted by the United States Federal government. The Israel Lobby Archive, http://IRmep.org/ila is a unit of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy in Washington.

Videos .....

The Israeli Nuclear Arsenal: Espionage, Opacity and Future 1/2

The Israeli Nuclear Arsenal: Espionage, Opacity and Future 2/2

The Runaway General in a Runaway War

Even those closest to McChrystal know that the rising anti-war sentiment at home doesn't begin to reflect how deeply fucked up things are in Afghanistan.

Read the entire article "The Runaway General"  here.




Let's get this out upfront.

War is run by deception and by lies. The media, including Rolling Stone, will only give us some truths while muddying the waters on the rest of the story.

This 'ambush' of McChrystal reeks of diversion and deception. Not he doesn't deserve to be ambushed. Remember, he was the guy who headed the cover up of  the assassination of Pat Tillman. He covered for war crimes of the Bush administration while involving himself in others right up to the present.


Obama is 'angry' and calls McChrystal to the White House for some 'splainin to do.'

President Obama reacted angrily to derogatory comments by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, about administration officials involved in Afghan policy and is leaving his options open about firing him, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday.

Gibbs described Obama as "angry" after reading about McChrystal's comments in a Rolling Stone magazine profile.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Tuesday that McChrystal "made a significant mistake and exercised poor judgment" in making the dismissive remarks to a reporter for the magazine.

McChrystal has been summoned to Washington to explain highly critical comments by him and his staff about Vice President Biden, U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl W. Eikenberry and other top Obama administration officials.{more}

Games and more games. The conservative cost of wars since 2001 has topped $1 trillion. The cost in lives of the U.S. and its allies and those of Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. are well over 1 million but no one is really counting.

Rolling Stone got one thing right. Afghanistan is deeply fucked up. They leave out the part about how fucked up Obama, McChrystal and the rest of the war mongering liars are, at least for 99.9% of the world. They also don't touch upon the criminal state of Israel or an objective analysis of 9/11. No need to wonder why that is. It's the same old who owns the media tale.


Anyway, now that this story is out in the open, let's move on to something more interesting to the majority of sleep walking Americans. Like Lady Gaga bares her heart ... eh Rolling Stone. 

McChrystal should buy a bunch of copies of the latest issue for his troops.

"Baby Huey" and Potato Eating Homegrown Terrorists

He was being turned into a baby bomber.












Fox interviews wild eyed John Batchelor who tells us some things we did not know.

"Mohammed Atta was a kook. He ate potatoes." (at 2:21 of video)

Batchelor did say something I haven't seen on MSM.

"Adam Gadahn, real name Pearlman.

He's a punk, we'll kill him."

The only way CIA/Mossad asset Pearlman will be killed is if he outlives his usefulness but that is unlikely. He makes such great Tel Aviv videos.

And that Atta 'potato' quote? I not only bought potatoes last week but I planted some in the garden. Does that mean I may be on a 'homegrown' terrorist watch list?

Glenn Beck to Rick Perry ~ "Rick, I think you and I could French kiss right now."

Where some of the more 'normal' media whores would just high five their allies after they complete a hit on an opponent, Glenn Beck likes to talk about french kissing a partner in crime, Texas governor Rick (Friend of Zion - Mr. Mandatory HPV vaccine) Perry.

"He's a damn handsome man, looks good in a pair of jeans" Beck and his gay talking sidekick said.

I don't know much about Debra Medina, the republican alternative candidate for Texas governor running against Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison but she seems to be a libertarian, a states rights advocate and a good person. Considering her rivals, she is a welcome fresh face.  According to polls she was gaining ground. That is until today.

She made a big mistake and went on the Glenn Beck radio show. In an attempt to possibly gain some votes, I suppose she was just too naive to think that Beck, the Perry and Palin ass kisser, would be fair and objective and not have an agenda to shut her momentum down.

Early in the interview, Beck took intimidating jabs at Medina repeatedly asking her about her background in an attempt to throw her off balance. It was clear from the beginning that Beck had no intention in gathering information as he would not allow Medina to finish her sentences and clearly was not listening.

What became obvious later in the interview was the question that Beck was holding in the back of his mind which would score the necessary points the portly pundit craved. He then asked Medina if she was a "911 Truther". This was a clear attack on Medina's association with Ron Paul who has many followers who question the myriad of unsettling discrepancies regarding the events that took place on September 11, 2001. This was the perfect opportunity to relegate a viable grassroots candidate into the arena of "fringe".

Medina's answer was appropriate.

"I don’t have all of the evidence there, Glenn, so I’m not in a place, I have not been out publicly questioning that. I think some very good questions have been raised in that regard, there are some very good arguments and I think the American people have not seen all the evidence there, so I have not taken a position on that."

Perry must have been working with Beck because he immediately attacked Medina and twisted her words.

Gov. Rick Perry is dismissing a suggestion from a Republican primary rival that the U.S. government was involved in the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Perry said GOP candidate Debra Medina's remarks Thursday "were an insult to the thousands of Americans who lost loved ones."

Perry countered that anyone "should be ashamed" for suggesting the administration of former President George W. Bush played a role in the attacks. Bush was Perry's predecessor as Texas governor. 

The rest of the compliant media jumped all over the story. 

Then Medina makes another mistake. She issues a statement saying that she's not a 'truther' and proceeds to give the same old bullshit line, "Muslims did it." She should have left it alone.

I was asked a question on the Glenn Beck show today regarding my thoughts on the so-called 9/11 truth movement. I have never been involved with the 9/11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9/11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones.

Here's the last bit of her response to Beck's interview and it was all that she needed.

The real underlying question here, though, is whether or not people have the right to question our government. I think the fact that people are even asking questions on this level gets to the incredible distrust career politicians have fostered by so clearly taking their direction from special interests instead of the people, whether it's Rick Perry and his HPV mandate or Kay Hutchison and voting for the bank bailout. It is absolutely the right and duty of a free people to question their government. Texas does not need another politician who tells you what you want to hear, then violates your liberties and steals your property anyway. I fully expect to be questioned and to be held accountable as Governor, and that's the underlying issue here: should people be questioning their government. And the answer is yes, they should be. {source}

Beck and his cronies at Fox must still be laughing. They'll be back slapping and french kissing each other all night long as they revel in their power to earn their blood money by manipulating and crushing those who don't toe the neocon line.

What's really sad is that 9/11 was a government sponsored false flag and even the most well meaning politicians are scared to death of facing the truth and speaking out about it for fear of losing votes from the brain dead population.

Bye bye Debra ... we hardly knew you.

I Love NPR ... It's my favorite propaganda channel

No need to watch the tube with all of their diversion and confusion, just listen to NPR radio every now and then. Cut to the chase ... get the bottom line ... They don't call it "national propaganda channel" for nothing.

Today's listening of 'all things considered' included a basic reading of how we can trade soil carbon credits and 'encourage' land holders to trap carbon on their land and hold it there. Some of that makes some sense, like growing stuff, but it seems this will be a big Wall Street enterprise. Right now I'm not exactly in the mood to give the bankers and traders any respect, so I'll pass on this investment.

NPR's feature story today is about the designated dissenter in the Copenhagen climate orgy, Saudi Arabia. Of course there can't be a 100% consensus. That would look like the whole thing is fixed. You can't have good guys without bad guys and the Saudis play the bad guy part very well as they always have. You might think they also may be a little worried as they look at the US/Israel movements to 'balkanize' the entire middle east. Sort of a game of 'last man standing.' The Saudis hope that they're last.

Saudi Arabia Tries To Stall Global Emissions Limits

photo NPR: a Saudi official stands in front of a giant Saudi oil industry picture at a hotel in the Red Sea port city of Jiddah, Saudi Arabia.

Don't you just love how they frame the debate with an image? They think they are photo artists.



Yes, NPR is the sophisticated spin. Telling us how the world according to the elite is being planned.

They want to be able to tell you "I told you so."

The Hypocrisy of Celebrating the Fall of the Berlin Wall and Ignoring Israel's "Iron Wall"

Israel's Iron Wall is much higher and longer than the Berlin Wall and has been built on illegally occupied land yet no U.S. president has called on the Israeli leaders to "tear down this wall." The hideous wall was built with the support and approval of the U.S. Congress and presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Many millions of American taxpayer dollars were used to build this wall.

by Christopher Bollyn

The Berlin Wall fell 20 years ago on November 9-10, 1989. Jewish-owned Music TV (MTV), Bono, and his band U2 will be celebrating along with millions of others the fall of the Berlin Wall while the entire world ignores its hideous cousin, the Israeli "Iron Wall" of separation.

So, why do so-called "political" singers like Bono ignore the very real suffering of millions of Palestinians and the new Berlin Wall that divides the Holy Land? Why does the music industry ignore the crisis in the Middle East, the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the illegal occupation of Palestine by Zionist Jews who desecrate the Holy Land? Where has the music gone?

Bono, a friend of presidents Bush and Clinton, will be giving a "free" concert at the Brandenburg Gate, the famous 18th Century portal to the city of Berlin. Today, 20 years after reunification, Berlin is the most modern, clean, and civilized metropolis in the world. It is the capital of the most prosperous nation in Europe and the Number One exporter in the world. It's easy for MTV and Bono to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years later -- but if they really cared about freedom and equality for all men why don't they do a free concert in occupied-Bethlehem or Jerusalem in front of the wall of the Zionist fortress state of Israel? Why doesn't President Barack Hussein Obama II call on the Israeli leaders to tear down this wall, as President Reagan did to the Soviet leadership? Neither Obama nor Bono would dare to speak out against Israeli apartheid policies or Zionist war crimes because they are owned and controlled by the Zionist Jews who made them what they are.

This is why the music has gone into the gutter and why there is no anti-war music or resistance music today. The Zionist Jews have taken over the entire music industry, lock, stock, and barrel. It is the same with the press media, the television networks, and the film industry. The whole shebang is completely controlled by Zionist Jews. The Zionist masters own the big record labels and send the musicians they own to Israel to try and improve the image of the criminals who run the Zionist state.

Read the rest at Bollyn

Jim Traficant interviewed by Sean Hannity

Also See... Peter Chamberlin's Israeli State of Extortion.

'Hammer' Time

The media image rehabilitation of Tom Delay.

Instead of 'dancing behind bars' the Hammer gets prime time exposure.

Why is Delay are over the tube?




The crimes and corruption of Delay is a long and sordid story which should have put the 'hammer' in the slammer but slithering away without receiving too much harm is the way of a snake.

Source Watch has a good run down on Delay's criminal and warmongering history but a certain aspect of his story gives a hint as to why he escaped prosecution. He has friends in 'low places.'

DeLay has been a strong supporter of the State of Israel, saying, "The Republican leadership, especially that leadership in the House, has made pro-Israel policy a fundamental component of our foreign policy agenda and it drives the Democrat [sic] leadership crazy — because they just can't figure out why we do it!"

On a 2003 trip to Israel, DeLay toured the nation and addressed members of the Knesset. His opposition to land concessions is so strong that Israel's conservative National Union Party deputy Aryeh Eldad remarked, "as I shook his hand, I told Tom DeLay that until I heard him speak, I thought I was farthest to the right in the Knesset." Former Mossad chief Danny Yatom said "The Likud is nothing compared to this guy." {much more here}

Being a criminal and traitor to one's country doesn't always mean having to say you're sorry.

Just ask Tom....

Can I push the button, huh, please, please?

Michael Delgiorno's sidekick, Gwen Freeman of Nashville's WTN didn't actually say this but she did ask a guest today "When do we preemptively attack Iran?" That guest, someone named Cohen, didn't give a straight answer but hinted that it may be soon.

Gwen, I'm assuming that anyone so up for new war would be glad to lend a hand.

Nashville's premier Christian Zionist radio show spent much time today 'discussing' Iran.

Among the highlights were:

Iran will try to destroy Israel. It's the only way to bring in the twelfth Imam and usher in world Islamic rule. Muslims believe that the only way to heaven is through jihad and martyrdom. They may even attack America...etc. etc.

This discourse was brought about by reports of an Ahmadinejad speech today in Tehran.

   Several reports quoted him as saying Friday that the Holocaust was a false pretext for the establishment of Israel in 1948. “It is a lie” based on an unprovable and “mythical claim,” he was quoted as saying in the speech. Mr. Ahmadinejad said the Israeli “regime has no future. Its life has come to an end,” Reuters reported. {more -NY Times}

So Michael and Gwen, you are so in favor of war that I'm sure you will be willing to pledge your children to die in them. When I see that pledge, then maybe I'll be willing to accept your sincerity.

Until then, you are both just another paid shill for Israel...