Economic Woes, a Consequence of Free Trade

 By one of my favorite writers and a very nice lady .....

Deanna Spingola

The abolition of nationalism and borders under the guise of the free trade has been the ultimate Illuminati objective since the late 1700s, notably illustrated by Aaron H. Palmer who had a law office on Wall Street in the first half of the 19th century. He catered to individuals interested in transnational business and managed their commerce and paperwork with the European bankers who advocated trade. By February 1837 when the bankers and politicians shrunk the U.S. credit market, Palmer already had a working relationship with N M Rothschild & Sons, located in the City of London. Palmer supplied the Rothschilds with an account of all the financial failures, as many as 280, in the months just before the final crash. {1}


The products of the labor of its citizens determine a nation's prosperity. A brisk manufacturing base is essential, augmented by the service industry. Nationalists believe in reasonable tariffs that protect the nation's industry. Free trade is detrimental to a nation's wealth. So-called “conservatives,” those Republican “nationalists” who claim to put the U.S. first have promoted and participated, along with the Democrats, in the legislation of all of the nation's free trade agreements. One cannot claim to cherish both sovereignty and accept free trade, through “multinational trade organizations and global financial conglomerates.” Marx, a mouthpiece minion for the elite, advocated both the income tax and free trade. He said of free trade, "it breaks up old nationalities" and eliminates the "bourgeoisie" (small businessmen). {2} Free trade functions to equalize the masses while elevating the elite and their acquiescent political devotees.

President Woodrow Wilson, advocating the elite's agenda, promoted the League of Nations as a global forum for the settlement of territorial disputes by arbitration, along with the power of aggressive military enforcement or through less aggressive sanctions and free global trade, as elucidated in his Fourteen Points, "equality of trade" and "removal ... of all economic barriers." {3} On December 23, 1913, certain members of Congress instituted the Federal Reserve, a vital step to the ultimate globalization of currency. The elite established tax-free foundations to escape the income tax trap they set for the rest of American society. In October 1913, B'nai B'rith established the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) possibly to counter criticism of many of the individuals responsible for the Federal Reserve.

Proponents of the New World Order, the banker's ultimate political monopoly, want the world's citizens to abandon political and cultural nationalism in favor of internationalism. U.S. politicians, through their machinations, have rejected (in our behalf) the nationalism once espoused by Thomas Jefferson and others. Nations lose their self-sufficiency and independence through external military action and/or through the actions of corrupt political leaders. In the U.S. these are often the prominent leaders of each political party who dictate partisan policy which includes the decision to wage war. Banker-funded warfare opens a nation to free trade. After warfare, war-torn, devastated nations, no longer able to meet their own needs, must depend on other nations to supply essential needs – food, clothing and supplies to reconstruct the bombed-out infrastructure.

Swiss business journalist and author Gian Trepp said "War, a place where moneymen can gather, because money is stronger than nationalism. Even during the war the moneymen of different nations needed to keep in touch because when the war stops, you have to rebuild and you need free trade." {4} Globalists have vilified the word “nationalist” in their battle to subtly convince us to accept world governance, a goal they hope to impose by 2025, according to their most recent 2010 publication, Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture.

Our current economic woes began long before the elites installed Obama, their current presidential puppet to further implement global governance. By 1980, Dr. Mordechai E. Kreinin, Professor of Economics, along with Michael G. Plummer, an economics professor at Johns Hopkins University, evaluated the idea of North American economic integration. Kreinin, still pushing internationalism through free trade, compiled Building a Partnership, the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, a series of papers presented by like-minded academics during the September 1998 conference at Michigan State University. He is the past president of the International Trade and Finance Association and has advised the UN, the State Department and the Commerce Department regarding trade relations.

In accordance with the exponents of internationalism, officials began negotiating the NAFTA in 1986 when Reagan was president. NAFTA was formally signed on December 17, 1992 under President George H.W. Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and Mexican President Carlos Salinas. Bush had lost the November 1992 election and left the job of getting congressional approval of the agreement to his successor, Bill Clinton and his vice president, longtime elite internationalist, Albert Gore.

On July 18, 1993 Henry Kissinger (CFR, TC) allegedly wrote in The Los Angeles Times about NAFTA, "What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system…a first step toward a new world order."

Gore approached Republican House Minority Whip (1989–1995), Newt Gingrich, just another internationalist still masquerading as a constitutionalist. He promised he could extract 132 votes for NAFTA, a treaty that author Ian Fletcher refers to as "a veritable case study in failure." {5} Congressional bribery just for NAFTA, known as “pork barrel promises” totaled $50 billion, paid by the U.S. taxpayers. NAFTA cost the Democrats control of the House and Senate in 1994. Gingrich then became Speaker of the House in 1995. Voters automatically punish the party in power for the treasonous acts committed under their jurisdiction when in fact, congressional members of both parties act in concert. By 1997, due to NAFTA, U.S. job losses amounted to about 394,835, mostly women, Blacks and Hispanics. The figure increased to 600,000 by January 1, 1999. Wages in Mexico sank by 29%. Clinton and Gore, like typical politicians, engaged in orchestrated opposition. At the 1997 AFL-CIO Pittsburgh Convention, Clinton was pro-NAFTA, while Gore feigned an anti-NAFTA stance. This charade won the AFL-CIO's endorsement of Gore in the 2000 elections. {6}

Mexican president Carlos Salinas de Gotari had endorsed the NAFTA concept in 1990, making it a political possibility. The Mexican public was the treaty's most formidable obstacle as it had a history of distancing itself from its northern neighbor. U.S. labor unions were very vocal about their opposition and their intent to retaliate against all legislators who voted for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The House of Representatives approved NAFTA on November 17, 1993, by a vote of 234 to 200. Those who supported the treaty included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. It passed the Senate by a vote of 61-38. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; it went into effect on January 1, 1994. {7} NAFTA added Mexico to the prior treaty, the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement, signed in 1988. NAFTA eliminated tariffs and the majority of non-tariff prohibitions between the three countries. Additionally, investors in the three countries were to enjoy the same treatment as domestic investors. {8}

NAFTA, promoted as a strategy to reduce US trade deficits, actually increased those deficits. In 1993, we had a $1.6 billion surplus in our trade with Mexico but by 2007, we had a $74.8 billion deficit. In 1994 we had an $8.1 billion yearly deficit with Canada, probably due to our oil importation despite our own adequate oil supply. NAFTA cost 525,000 US jobs between 1994 and 2002. Some figures state the total of jobs lost at 766,000, primarily among the non-college-educated population – the producers in the manufacturing segment. Mexico, as a US trading partner, is too poor, to be an export market for American goods. {9}

Pat Buchanan, referring to NAFTA, wrote, "Two years after NAFTA, the predictions of its opponents had all come true. The U.S. trade surplus with Mexico had vanished; a trade deficit of $15 billion had opened up. Trucks heading north out of Mexico were hauling more and more manufactured goods, while those going south carried machinery and equipment for the new factories going up, pointing to endless and deepening U.S. trade deficits. By 1997, 3,300 maquiladora factories were operating, employing 800,000 Mexican workers in jobs that not long ago would have gone to Americans." {10}

Over 80% of the American population opposed NAFTA. Despite massive objections against Trade Agreements, both Democrats and Republicans habitually cater to the banks and corporations. George H. W. Bush (CFR, TC) and George W. Bush personally promoted NAFTA. It weakened U.S. and Canadian environmental laws and increased the misery in Mexico and ultimately, in addition to faulty currency policies and manipulations, contributed to the crash of the peso, further impoverishing the regular citizens. {11}

Promoters sold NAFTA, trade with Mexico, by promising new job creation in the U.S. Yet, research studies and historical examples in other countries provided adequate information and experience to discourage any kind of free trade with two inequitable countries. Labor-intensive manufacturers, encouraged by NAFTA, relocated to Mexico where Mexican nationals were willing to work for less. To get it passed, the Mexican government spent millions on lobbyists and public relations. U.S. capital, about $70 billion, went south with American jobs. New companies emerged in Mexico, along with debt in the form of interest for loans. There are about 90,000,000 people in Mexico, out of which 200,000 people control the entire wealth of the nation – thirty-two families.

Unfortunately, Mexico, along with many other third world countries, became victims of the economic hit men. John Perkins recently revealed their tactics in his Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Mexico was generating about $30 billion a year towards paying the debt service or interest on its international banking cabal loans. Yet the actual cost amounted to $40-45 billion per year. Alan Greenspan, then chairman of the privately owned Federal Reserve increased the interest rates in late 1994 which deliberately "devastated the Mexican Economy." {12} In December 1994, Mexico devalued the peso by about 40%. {13} Congress immediately approved a $40 taxpayer funded billion-dollar loan despite debt-burdened Mexico's inability to repay it. That loan was merely a transfer from our pockets into the international bankers' coffers. The recent bailouts and Obama's stimulus package, disguised as assistance to the populace, is a huge transference of wealth – again from the taxpayer’s pockets into the banker's pockets.

After NAFTA, the Clinton administration hammered through 200 additional trade agreements. The World Trade Organization (WTO) replaced the GATT. {14} The WTO opened the world to corporate predators and further diluted environmental, labor and human rights. The Bretton Woods Agreement (1945), an amendment to the Federal Reserve Act, ultimately led to the establishment of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the GATT, a global economic system that managed free trade with the dollar as the world's basic currency. The elite designed the system to ensure British and U.S. hegemony over monetary and trade issues. The Federal Reserve, a private enterprise, became master of the economic system.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is located in Geneva, Switzerland. Congress created the WTO as "a policeman, a global free trade enforcer, and a battering ram for the trillion dollar annual world agribusiness trade." The WTO was devised "to advance the interests of private agribusiness companies." It is not accountable to any nation's laws. The WTO may impose disciplinary penalties or other measure on member countries that violate their regulations. The WTO may also force countries to accept genetically modified crops. The WTO is a product of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Seventy-five GATT members and the European Communities founded the WTO on January 1, 1995 as a result of Uruguay Round of trade liberalization talks, held in del Este, Uruguay, in September 1986, and concluded in Marrakech, Morocco, in April 1994. {15}

According to Ian Fletcher, "The U.S. should seek strategic, not unconditional integration with the rest of the world economy. Economic openness, like most things in life, is valuable up to a point – but not beyond it. Fairly open trade, most of the time, is justified. Absolutely free trade, 100 percent of the time, is an extremist position and is not." Free trade is certainly not inevitable. A former British colony, the U.S., for decades, protected their manufacturing base through protectionist tariffs. The regulation of commerce was included in the Constitution, Article I, Section 8 authorizes Congress "to regulate commerce with foreign nations," a mandate that is in the best interests of the nation and its people. {16} Nation states are economically essential and relevant as most people, according to Fletcher, live in the country in which they were born. Consequently, their “economic fortunes depend upon the wage and consumption levels within that one society." When trade laws, to benefit large firms, alter the economic nationalism of a nation, it impacts every resident. {17}

Free trade, as currently practiced with chronic US deficits and a plethora of cheap imports, can actually "seduce" a population into “decadent consumption.” People have abandoned the tradition of saving and frugal living. Business owners often fail to reinvest profits and instead depend on bank loans. Seemingly, individuals in their personal or business circumstances prefer to mortgage their futures in order to obtain immediate gratification. Fletcher claims that Americans are addicted to debt as evidenced by the incidence of consumer credit. America's combined household and government debt totals 243% of GDP as opposed to China where the government discourages personal debt. At least 500 million Chinese people have a cell phone but only one million Chinese residents have a credit card. {18} China is the world's largest mobile telephone market. {19} I visited China in 2007 and was amazed at its thriving economy, the huge building projects throughout the country, and the presence of large US-based corporations, like Motorola, in Beijing.

Robert B. Zoellick (CFR, TC, Bilderberg, PNAC), current President of the World Bank, as Under Secretary of State for Economic and Agricultural Affairs (1991-1992) helped seal the NAFTA accord with Mexico. He was also instrumental in launching the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum. He was a U.S. Trade Representative (2001-2005) who attempted to fast track the Free Trade of Americas Agreement (FTAA) and negotiated the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) in May 2004. He advised George W. Bush on foreign policy during the 2000 campaign as part of a group led by Condoleezza Rice called The Vulcans. Bush nominated Zoellick to replace Paul Wolfowitz (PNAC) as the new World Bank president. {20}

Residents flee when their nation's economy fails, or when it is devastated by war. Illegals in the U.S. increased from three million in the 1990s to eleven million with about 55% or six million individuals from Mexico. This resulted from Mexico's economic crisis in conjunction with George W. Bush's so-called "guest-worker" program, possibly associated with his secretive meeting in Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005 with then Mexican President Vicente Fox and then Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. They met to discuss the formation of the North American Community which is, by default, a done deal. The U.S. government has been deliberately ineffective in protecting the southern border in order to create a destabilizing cultural and economic crisis in the U.S.

NAFTA Vote by Party and City, Suburb and Rural Location:
Anti NAFTA Pro NAFTA {21}

Democrats
City 67.4% 32.6%
Suburb 59.6% 40.4%
Rural 52.2% 47.8%

Republicans
City 22.2% 77.8%
Suburb 26.4% 73.6%
Rural 21.4% 78.6% 

Some of the same treasonous scoundrels that voted for NAFTA are currently appearing on the privately owned media busily blaming the current administration for not fixing the economy, a direct result of NAFTA. Some of those neo-cons include Newt Gingrich, John Boehner, Tom DeLay, Dick Durbin, Jeffrey Flake, Thomas Foley, John Kasich, Dick Armey, Dennis Hastert, and on the left, Nancy Pelosi. She, as Speaker of the House, pushed through the disastrous healthcare bill in the same manner. These politicians count on the fact that the US public has forgotten who voted on NAFTA and what it did. They are now blaming the bulk of the country's economic woes on others, such as people who shouldn't have borrowed money to buy homes (now in foreclosure) and a number of other issues – never on the fact that they imposed a treaty on the US that was deliberately designed to de-industrialize the country and cause an economic catastrophe. Neo-con Republicans continue to maintain that NAFTA was a good policy, but for who? Mexico, now a slave-wage corporate slum-burb from which desperate citizens attempt to escape is a direct result of NAFTA. Meanwhile, jobless, middle-class Americans struggle to stave-off foreclosure.   

In March 2010 Rep. Gene Taylor, a Mississippi Democrat, lead a small group of twenty-eight lawmakers who introduced legislation that would require President Obama to relinquish our participation in NAFTA, the 16-year trade agreement that began the de-industrialization of America, a process that has created the current joblessness (10 to 12%) and the economic fallout. The National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, organizations that represent the elite, have always supported NAFTA. If Taylor's legislation passes, Obama would have to give Canada and Mexico six months' notice of the U.S. intentions to vacate the pact. {22}

In his campaign speeches Obama opposed NAFTA but now is in the process of negotiating with officials in South Korea, Panama and Colombia to implement trade pacts with those countries. In March 2010, U.S. officials also began trade negotiations with Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Chile, Peru, Vietnam and Brunei in what would be the Asia-Pacific regional free-trade agreement. Members of the House of Representatives are supposed to vote before the end of the year whether the U.S. is to retain their membership in the World Trade Organization. {23}

Ian Fletcher says, "Free trade is inexorably bleeding our economy and preventing it from returning to true health. Nobody in the Obama administration wants to talk about the economics of free trade, because as soon as one seriously scrutinizes this doctrine, one begins to discover that free trade may be the biggest myth in American economics." {24}

1 There is no Need for Anyone to go to America: Commercial Correspondence and Nineteenth Century Globalization from Papers found by Jessica Lepler, Assistant Professor of American History at the University of New Hampshire, during research into the 1837 financial crisis in the US.
2 The Judas Goats, the Enemy Within by Michael Collins Piper, American Free Press, Washington, DC, 2006, p. 30
3 Rockefeller Internationalism by Will Banyan, Part 1, Nexus Magazine Volume 10 - Number 3, (April-May 2003)
4 Hitler's Secret Bankers, the Myth of Swiss Neutrality During the Holocaust by Adam LeBor, Birch Lane Press, New York, 1997, p. 73
5 Free Trade Doesn't Work, What Should Replace It and Why by Ian Fletcher, U.S. Business & Industry Council, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 158-159
6 Al Gore: A User's Manual by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, Verso 2000, pp. 160-171
7 Organized Labor's Campaign Contributions after the NAFTA Vote: Rhetoric or Retribution? by Gretchen Anne Phillips and Edward Tower, p. 3
8 NAFTA, GATT Uruguay Round, and Fast Track 1998: a Brief Legislative History, Institute for International Economics, www.iie.com, p. 1
9 Free Trade Doesn't Work, What Should Replace It and Why by Ian Fletcher, U.S. Business & Industry Council, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 158-159
10 The Great Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrificed to the Gods of the Global Economy by Patrick J. Buchanan, Little, Brown, New York, p. 269
11 Al Gore: A User's Manual by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair, Verso 2000, pp. 160-171
12 Texas and Mexico, Immediate Impact of the Mexican Crisis
13 NAFTA and the Peso Collapse, Not Just a Coincidence by Robert A. Blecker, Economic Policy Institute, Briefing Paper, http://www.epinet.org/briefingpapers/1997_bp_nafta.pdf
14 Seeds of Destruction, the Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation by F. William Engdahl, Global Research, Center for Research on Globalization, Montreal, Quebec, 2007, pp. 216-247
15 Ibid, p. 217
16 Free Trade Doesn't Work, What Should Replace It and Why by Ian Fletcher, U.S. Business & Industry Council, Washington, DC, 2010, pp. 20-21. This is a book that everyone interested in so-called free trade should read.
17 Ibid, pp. 23-24, 25
18 Ibid, pp. 48-49
19 Motorola's Cell-Phone Stumble in China, Telecom August 28, 2008, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_36/b4098056926227.htm
20 Robert Zoellick, http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1397
21 Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper, Washington, DC, Political Arithmetic of the NAFTA Vote by Lawrence Mishel and Ruy A. Teixeira, p. 12, http://epi.3cdn.net/3d995382f3252362c7_ydm6bxl4u.pdf
22 Reuters, A small group of U.S. lawmakers unveiled legislation on Thursday to withdraw from the North American Free Trade Agreement in the latest sign of congressional disillusionment with free-trade deals, http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6233MS20100304
23 Ibid
24 Free Trade Doesn't Work, What Should Replace It and Why by Ian Fletcher, http://www.freetradedoesntwork.com/

  

Archive of Deanna Spingola's articles 

Deanna's new book When the Power Elite Rules: A Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation

  

This post via The Peoples Voice 

Justice Stephen Breyer - Globalization Challenging the Constitution

"Get it through your head, the constitution and your 'rights' are only what we say they are."









For years Breyer has been talking about globalization and how the supreme court is and will be influenced  by world laws and views not necessarily in sync with traditional U.S. constitution rulings. It's not Sharia law as zionist shill Pamela Geller says. He is talking about more of a hybrid of the Talmud and globalist Orwellian control.


 Breyer on Sept. 14, 2010 ...

Breyer in 2007 ...

It’s happening across the world. It’s popularly called “globalization”. But what it involves are people in business, people in law, learning what each other are doing. And they adjust their laws accordingly.

So what I see as happening – and it’s not a political matter – what I see as happening is people who are lawyers and judges in America today have to be aware. And they have to have a system of being aware about what’s going on elsewhere. Because the cases in front of them will more and more depend on what’s happening elsewhere. 

Breyer in 2003 ...

"We see all the time, Justice O'Connor and I, and the others, how the world really – it's trite but it's true – is growing together," Breyer said. "Through commerce, through globalization, through the spread of democratic institutions, through immigration to America, it's becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how they're going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations, I think will be a challenge for the next generations."

Asked to explain what he meant when he said judges who favor a very strict literal interpretation of the Constitution can't justify their practices by claiming that's what the framers wanted, Breyer responded: "I meant that the extent to which the Constitution is flexible is a function of what provisions you're talking about. When you look at the word 'two' for two representatives from every state in the United States Senate, two means two. But when you look like a word – look at a word like 'interstate commerce,' which they didn't have automobiles in mind, or they didn't have airplanes in mind, or telephones, or the Internet, or you look at a word like 'liberty,' and they didn't have in mind at that time the problems of privacy brought about, for example, by the Internet and computers. You realize that the framers intended those words to maintain constant values, but values that would change in their application as society changed." 

In Breyer's 2004 book Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International Conversation, the unifying theme is the globalization of constitutional law.


Breyer is no friend of the 2nd amendment. In the D.C. vs. Heller ruling he wrote a dissenting opinion that  hints of a globalist view of disarming the masses. History tells us the results of gun control.

Breyer's words ...

The majority’s conclusion is wrong for two independent reasons. The first reason is that set forth by Justice Stevens—namely, that the Second Amendment protects militia-related, not self-defense-related, interests. These two interests are sometimes intertwined. To assure 18th-century citizens that they could keep arms for militia purposes would necessarily have allowed them to keep arms that they could have used for self-defense as well. But self-defense alone, detached from any militia-related objective, is not the Amendment’s concern.

The second independent reason is that the protection the Amendment provides is not absolute. The Amendment permits government to regulate the interests that it serves. Thus, irrespective of what those interests are—whether they do or do not include an independent interest in self-defense—the majority’s view cannot be correct unless it can show that the District’s regulation is unreasonable or inappropriate in Second Amendment terms. This the majority cannot do.{more}

Breyer is really not much of a historical constitutional scholar. He thinks John Adams was one of its authors.  I suppose he was too busy studying early zionist history.

After meeting with Jacob de Haas, a former secretary to [Zionist leader] Theodore Herzl in 1912," notes current Jewish Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer, "[Brandeis] joined the American Federation of Zionists and started making public remarks in support of Zionism ... In 1917 ... his intervention with President Wilson helped secure American support for the Balfour Declaration [in support of a Jewish state in Palestine], thereby assuring its issuance. In 1938, not long before his death, he called upon President Roosevelt, seeking FDR's public diplomatic support for allowing more Jewish refugees to travel to Palestine." [BREYER, p. 18]

Breyer is a member of The International Advisory Council of The Israel Democracy Institute.

In 2008, Breyer was the keynote speaker at the ADL Leadership Meeting.





The globalization and zionization of America continues .... right up to the highest court of the land.

Intensifying "Service Nation"

There seems to be a convergence of several aspects in the agenda of 'service nation.'

There's the Haiti message of “just send your cash” or adopt kids or entertain the idea of allowing illegals to stay in the US and maybe bring refugees in.

The MLK Day of Service

The Rockefeller Foundation announcement of grants to cities for some beginnings of a bureaucracy of 'service.'

There's Service Nation and their endorsers, Serve.gov, Cities of Service and their like. Government and 'NGO' agencies ready to teach you the best way to volunteer and give.

A 'service law,' The Serve America Act has been passed and is in the early stages of implementation. Mandatory volunteerism is one of the long term goals. Kids make good workers and spies if they're not needed as soldiers.

Volunteering and helping your neighbors is a basic human virtue. There are local networks and individuals who do tremendous work in service of their fellow man. If it wasn't for the theft of our labor and wages by government extortion called taxes we could do much more.

As with everything else in the agenda of globalized slavery, service must be centralized. The problems are too great for the locals to handle. We have to create a federal bureaucracy to coordinate 'service' and make it more efficient. It will be a for profit effort for a few. The rest of us get brownshirts.

The policy of service through funding as defined in general terms by the Rockefeller initiatives ...

Through grantmaking, the Rockefeller Foundation works to spread the benefits of globalization to more people in more places around the world. The Foundation is a proactive grantmaker. We seek out opportunities to fund work that addresses the Foundation’s areas of focus and contributes to one or more of our initiatives, rather than simply reacting to unsolicited proposals. Only proposals that fall within the Foundation’s initiatives are considered. {source}

Yemen: Another Step in the Balkanization of the Middle East

The map below should be seen as a work in progress. How to accomplish the breakup of the middle east is in constant change but the policy remains the same. It may not work.

Note: The following map was prepared by Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters. It was published in the Armed Forces Journal in June 2006, Peters is a retired colonel of the U.S. National War Academy. (Map Copyright Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters 2006). Although the map does not officially reflect Pentagon doctrine, it has been used in a training program at NATO's Defense College for senior military officers. This map, as well as other similar maps, has most probably been used at the National War Academy as well as in military planning circles.

Plans for Redrawing the Middle East: The Project for a “New Middle East” - 2006

The “New Middle East” project was introduced publicly by Washington and Tel Aviv with the expectation that Lebanon would be the pressure point for realigning the whole Middle East and thereby unleashing the forces of “constructive chaos.” This “constructive chaos” --which generates conditions of violence and warfare throughout the region-- would in turn be used so that the United States, Britain, and Israel could redraw the map of the Middle East in accordance with their geo-strategic needs and objectives. {more}

US warns Yemen to be focus in "worldwide" war

Underwear Man in Bed With Indians

The Prestige - Part 1: The Pledge

Dancing With Snakes

Clinton: Yemen threatens region, world

Caspian Sea Geopolitics: Nabucco will be the most expensive pipeline ever built

I Am Not Optimistic About 2010: A New Year Same Agenda

Wars "R" Us: Making the World Safe for American Domination

US drone missiles slaughtered 700 Pakistani civilians in 2009

Obama's War on Yemen

The United States’ Global Agenda, vis-à-vis South Asia

It is a well-known fact among international security experts that one of the longstanding foreign policy doctrines of the United States is to destabilize countries and regions that are considered hostile to US economic and strategic interests. This policy has been the bedrock of American military and covert operations across the globe throughout the cold war period. When the US fails to win support from countries for its self-interested economic and defense policies, the US undertakes covert operations to overthrow democratically elected leaders in those countries by supporting military juntas and insurgent movements, cut off economic aid, and isolate them internationally until they give in to US pressure.

What is Israel's Role in the Destabilization of Pakistan?

When waging war “by way of deception,” the motto of the Israeli Mossad, well-timed crises play a critical agenda-setting role by displacing facts with what a target population can be deceived to believe. Thus the force-multiplier effect when staged crises are reinforced with pre-staged intelligence. In combination, the two often prove persuasive

Neutered Sovereignty?

art from Pirate News




Obama gave a lackluster speech to the climate change crowd at Copenhagen. The BS may be catching up with him and his intensity may be fading.

"I have to be honest, as the world watches us today, I think our ability to take collective action is in doubt right now, and it hangs in the balance.

America will be a part of fast-start funding that will ramp up to $10 billion by 2012. And yesterday, Secretary Hillary Clinton, my Secretary of State, made it clear that we will engage in a global effort to mobilize $100 billion in financing by 2020, if -- and only if -- it is part of a broader accord.

Mitigation. Transparency. Financing. It's a clear formula."

In Obamawellian speak mitigation is big government control of all the aspects of 'pollution,' transparency is opaque and financing is theft.

Sovereignty is not yet dead. The fat lady is warming up her pipes but hasn't sung.

The ever present Lord Christopher Monckton has stated that the only goal of the conference was to implement the framework and the funding for a world government – which he asserts has been achieved but there is 'hope' that the scam can be overcome.

If reports are correct, a climate draft accord has been reached and taxpayer costs for the extortion racket in the US will be ...

$US10 billion a year from 2010 to 2012, climbing to $US50 billion annually by 2015 and $US100 billion by 2020.

Since the American public hasn't gone down kicking and screaming over the billions/trillions in banker giveaways, endless wars and political corruptions, I'm not so sure that that this scheme won't succeed. It's what the globalists are betting on ... that we actually are sheep and the slaughter is not far away.

But perhaps they have underestimated us and overestimated how much they can suck from the host ... "it’s hard to run when your belly is full of blood."

Meanwhile, Hugo Chavez spoke right after Obama at the conference and what did he say?

"By the way, it smells of sulfur in here."

Proof the Copenhagen Climate Conference is a Fraud ... Hemp is 'off the table'

No matter where you stand on the issue of 'climate change,' a sure sign that the Copenhagen conference is not really interested in solutions but only in the extortion of money and global control is that hemp is not 'on the table.'

Ever hear Al Gore say a word on the benefit of planting massive amounts of hemp as a carbon capture plant and its many uses that could replace thousands of polluting products and create hundreds of thousands of 'green' jobs.

Nope, you haven't and you never will. It would make too much sense. The frauds want a centralized mechanism where only a few benefit and the rest of the world would be under their thumb.

We should say no to false science, CO2 demonetization, cap and trade, carbon credits, the UN, bankers, big oil and corporate thieves and yes to hemp, small farmers and the new entrepreneurs who actually have some answers for a better world. Easier said than done but we can get there.



Silence at Copenhagen ...

Hemp Global Solutions

Our basic premise is that hemp is far more productive than typical agro-forestry projects, producing annual, versatile biomass alongside more rapid CO2 uptake. It can produce a vast range of sustainable raw materials with an overall low environmental impact, as well as improving soil structure, using low fertiliser and no other chemical inputs (i.e. reduced agrochemical residues).

Hemp can be grown on existing agricultural land (unlike most forestry projects), and can be included as part of a farm's crop rotation with positive effects on overall yields of follow on crops. This, along with super versatility in diverse soil conditions and climates, makes hemp cultivation a viable and genuine potential.

The vast quantities of hemp derived products and raw materials created by large scale cultivation could replace many oil-based unsustainable products and materials, particularly in construction, locking in captured CO2 and creating secondary benefits to the global environment. In particular, hemp could be used to replace significant quantities of tree-derived products, allowing reduced use of existing tree populations, thus maintaining their CO2 uptake.

Hemp also produces much higher quantities of stronger and more versatile fibre than cotton, and many other fibre crops, which often have very high chemical residue and water footprints. Extra processing required by hemp is also at least partially offset by its recycling potential. {more}

Jack Herer has a $100,000 Challenge to Prove Us Wrong!

If all fossil fuels and their derivatives, as well as trees for paper and construction, were banned in order to save the planet, reverse the Greenhouse Effect and stop deforestation;

then there is only one known annually renewable natural resource that is capable of providing the overall majority of the world's paper and textiles; meet all of the world's transportation, industrial and home energy needs, while simultaneously reducing pollution, rebuilding the soil and cleaning the atmosphere all at the same time...

and that substance is the same one that has done it before . . .

CANNABIS HEMP!

Houses made of hemp coud help combat climate change!

Hemp and Lots of It, Could Be One Climate Solution

Hemp Is Not Pot: It's the Economic Stimulus and Green Jobs Solution We Need

Hemp: A New Crop with New Uses for North America


While on the subject, let's just legalize marijuana in every form. It's time for the 'war on drugs' scam to end.

Climate Refugees - coming to a town near you?

Leading up to the Copenhagen scam ...

Western nations should open up borders to millions of 'climate refugees' says Bangladeshi minister

Migration is the only escape from rising tides of climate change in Bangladesh

The new migrants ...

Climaterefugees.com says ...

There is a new phenomenon in the global arena called “Climate Refugees”. A climate refugee is a person displaced by climatically induced environmental disasters. Such disasters result from incremental and rapid ecological change, resulting in increased droughts, desertification, sea level rise, and the more frequent occurrence of extreme weather events such as hurricanes, cyclones, fires, mass flooding and tornadoes. All this is causing mass global migration and border conflicts. For the first time, the Pentagon now considers climate change a national security risk and the term climate wars is being talked about in war-room like environments in Washington D.C. {more}

If you look at the 'friends' of climatrefugees, you find many of the same groups funded by the Rothschild/Rockefeller/oligarch overseers that have been getting some media play lately and sucking in converts.

People have become displaced because of weather events throughout history. Katrina was our last major example. It happens. Most of us want to help.

But if the globalist agenda of the bankers and UN control and loss of US sovereignty through forced environmental 'agreements' actually gets pulled off, we are set up to being forced to take on millions of the 'climate migrants.'

Another part of the plan is amnesty for illegal immigrants and an invitation for all of their family and friends to join them. Combine this with the 'climate refugees' and and we get to diversify our country more than ever.

Who's going to benefit?

AGENDA 21 ALERT: PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS

Joan Veon





CAPITALIZING ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - MAKING GOLD OUT OF GREEN

This is a Street Brawl for Truth and Freedom

excerpt from Climategate: A Crime Against Humanity

by Mike Rivero

It is clear that government, the media, corporatized science, have quite literally bet the farm on selling the illusion of human cause global warming as justification for global taxes and global government. In order to bring about global government simultaneous with creating the illusion of a need they have to destroy the credibility of the regional governments and we have seen a great deal of this lately. Now the oligarchs face an awkward choice. They have set the stage for a collapse of the national governments and the global government they wish to install in its place may be collapsing right along with the myth of global government.

Various governments and the media are so heavily invested in selling the illusion of human cause global warming, that if that hoax is exposed, if the public becomes aware of the monstrous fraud involved, those institutions of government and media could very well be destroyed and by their own hands.

Already we are seeing the organizers and perpetrators of this fraud trying to limit the damage from this exposure in several ways. The media is already hard at work attempting to dump the blame and scandal solely on the climate scientists, who after all were only doing what they were paid to do. This is not to say the scientists are not guilty. Quite the contrary, they deserve to be pilloried publicly and humiliated for their betrayal of the public trust. To say that their careers should be ended is an understatement. But in our haste to punish the scientists who assisted in the lies to the world, we must not forget that the scientists were working for somebody; for politicians such as Al Gore, for an agenda called global government, and for those who wanted to get rich by selling is a fictitious product called carbon credit.

Yet another tactic being employed to limit the damage from climate gate, is to insist that even though the scientist responsible for the climate warming data have been exposed as holsters that the validity of the data itself must remain above question above reproach. This of course is nonsense. If you hire a contractor to build a home, and discover afterwards that the contractor has a history of using substandard materials and sloppy workmanship, do you continue to believe the home he has billed shoe is solid and durable and safe? Of course not. And yet the global warming cultists, are demanding exactly this kind of naïveté from the public at large.

So is climate gate a fraud? Is climate gate a scientific scandal? No. Climate gate is first and foremost a political scandal. More than that it is a global political scandal, that involves governments, media, institutionalize science, the banks, universities, indeed a vast cross-section of our ruling classes. It is more than a scandal; climate gate is a crime against humanity. And this is not an exaggeration. The goal of climategate was to extract money from every human being on planet Earth in exchange for a nonexistent salvation from a nonexistent threat. The goal of climate gate was to trick every human being on planet Earth into accepting the yoke of a global oligarchy with no more legitimate claim to power than those who ruled by divine right.

We are at a watershed moment. We may well see a transition to a new and better political structure for the entire world. But it will not be the one that has been designed for us. If nothing else the ability for government and media to lie to the population of the world on such a vast scale is forever destroyed. Climate gate will relegate all of the official stories of the governments of the United States and Great Britain and indeed every government that took part in the human cause global warming hoax to the same level of credibility as Ramses carvings showing his victory over the Hittites. It will be seen as an historic joke by future generations.

But we are not there yet. The forces that have enslaved us with deception and fraud and hoax are desperate to hang onto their power and authority. They are busy coming up with new hoaxes and frauds to scare us back into obedience. And the media well aware that they cannot report on the lies of climate gate without reporting their own complicity are working hand in glove with government to reassert their ability to control what you think and when you think it.

So, what we the free people of planet Earth need to do in the coming weeks is become the new mainstream media. The TV networks and other corporate media have been handed their marching orders to resell the illusion of human cause climate change in any way shape or form that will convince you to accept new taxes and the loss of your freedoms. The only way the rest of the world is going to find out about climate gate is if you tell them. Because the TV and news magazines won't. If it's mentioned at all, it will be to trivialize and dismiss it and assure the world it really doesn't matter. BBC is still reporting climate gate as just another computer crime. This is like reporting Watergate as just another burglary!

We have collected together a vast body of evidence calling into question the legitimacy of the claims of human cause global warming. We have collected together a vast body of evidence proving fraud and deception on the part of the global warming cult. Please for this information to everybody you know in times of the essence. Barack Obama as already indicated that he will not be swayed by the exposure of the fraud in the CRU/NWIA data, and fully intends to go to Copenhagen to sign away our national sovereignty as "penance" for our contribution to global warming.

Other observers have commented that the moment president Obama signs that Copenhagen Treaty his credibility as president of the United States will be destroyed. For him to sign away sovereignty of our nation on the basis of a known lie should enrage all Americans and make it clear that the federal government is not working in the interests of the American people any more, but in service to this emerging globalist socialistic empire. Remember; global government is what Hitler wanted. Global Government is what Napoleon wanted. Global Government is what Alexander the Great wanted. Global Government is what the Roman Caesars wanted.

Climategate may well prove to be the final fight in the war between those who would rule us with lies and those who wish to live with truth. Climategate makes it clear that yes, there really are massive conspiracies between government and the media to mislead the general public. You cannot pretend they don't exist; one is right there before you staked out naked on the ground, exposed for all to marvel at! I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide how many other such deceptions form what we think we know of the world and of history.

There are two paths into the future. Along one lies freedom and truth and prosperity for the people. Along the other lies a socialist dictatorship, born in deception, unable and unwilling to tolerate dissent, and dedicated to robbing the poor to give to the rich.

You need to decide which future you wish to live in.

And you need to decide what you will do about it.

see the entire article

TckTckTck

Once again we have a globalist backed front group that is leading the flock. This time towards Copenhagen.

TckTckTck is a slick organization. They get a lot of young folks to think they are doing something important and 'dance for the climate' and encourage their 'leaders' to tax the very air we breathe if that's what is necessary to save us from ourselves. Turning a midnight oil song into a contrived anthem for all of the useful idiots is one of their 'accomplishments.' "Pay the rent, pay our share"

Tck seems to want to be a centralized umbrella group, unifying the message...

Our partners range from some of the largest civil society organizations in the world, including the World Wildlife Fund, Oxfam, and Amnesty International, to our equally important individual, local, and national partners, like Presencia Ciudadana Mexicana. We are unified globally, bringing together faith groups, like the World Council of Churches, anti-poverty groups, like the Global Campaign Against Poverty, and science organizations, like the Union of Concerned Scientists.

TckTckTck is a project of the Global Campaign for Climate Action (GCCA), a bold, new initiative involving a growing number of national and global organizations in support of a single goal: to mobilize civil society and to galvanize public opinion in support of transformational change and rapid action to save the planet from dangerous levels of climate change. {more] {List of Tck partners}

Now before I join up with the Tck gang, I'd like to know where their funding comes from.
From their website...

The campaign is funded by a number of private foundations directly engaged on the issue of climate change.

You might think Tck would be proud of these private foundations that give them a ton of money and shout out some kudos but I guess those foundations are just shy and don't want the publicity. A google search doesn't turn up much info on who funds Tck.

But we do know that one of the partners of Tck is '350,' a subsidiary of the Sustainable Markets Foundation, an offshoot of The Rockefeller Brothers Fund. {more}

So, we may infer that the Tck funding is similar and that the money trail goes back to the central banks and their allies who will benefit the most from the carbon scam.

Tck will have a presence at the Copenhagen Climate Conference and will get some tv time and a pass. From reports, other groups that may not be as friendly to the agenda may get to be an experiment in 'thought crimes.'

The Danish parliament today passed legislation which will give police sweeping powers of "pre-emptive" arrest and extend custodial sentences for acts of civil disobedience. The "deeply worrying" law comes ahead of the UN climate talks which start on 7 December and are expected to attract thousands of activists from next week.

Under the new powers, Danish police will be able to detain people for up to 12 hours whom they suspect might break the law in the near future. {more}

If you're not with Tic and the gang, then you had better watch your thoughts...the Danish think they can read them.

Pre-emptive, now where have we heard that before? That used to be only for wars of aggression and theft but it may be coming down to those who only speak against the religion of 'climate change' and eventually anything else deemed heretical.

TckTckTck

Let them eat carbon credits

"The threat to our environment is not a new concern but it is now a global challenge which will continue to affect the security and stability of millions for years to come,"

"The Commonwealth has an opportunity to lead once more"


The threat to the carbon tax/cap and trade/one world CO2 scam has gone to red alert since climategate, so....break out the queen. The subjects may still believe.

Marie Antoinette comes to mind. Sometimes the people get tired of the ones that control them and steal the fruits of their labor.

But while we're waiting for the revolution, let's focus this Thanksgiving weekend on shopping for Chinese trinkets and the latest created diversion... the White House crashers.

What a wonderful world.....

Capitalism and Leninism/Communism are two arms of the same beast.

"Capitalism is not 'free enterprise,' an incentive for success, 'a chance for all.' Capitalism is trusts, speculation, parasitical usury. Capitalism is J. P. Morgan, Rothschild's bank, ripping apart the nations like maddened swine. Capitalism is the jewish frying pan in which culture is rendered down to the grease of money." William Striker

Revolution/change is not always what it seems at first. Just ask the Russians. This time the genocide may be here.

I heard a couple of local farmers here lately call our government 'communist.'

More people are catching on that things are getting out of hand, but are they willing to do anything about it?

Zionism, communism and capitalism are intimately intertwined. History repeats if we let it.

The Conspiracy Business and All That Jazz

From Incogman

Now, we all should know something is up. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. In fact, I consider those who blow it all off as hogwash as fairly naïve (which is a nice way of saying blithering idiot). Something’s going on — you can just sense it. Plus, if you know some of the more unmentioned, but factual history of the last hundred years or so, and are not blinded by PC, you’ll be able to spot it. Some call it ”hiding in plain sight.”

I once read (or think I did) this one particular quote and I’ve looked for it a lot in the past, but just can’t find it anywhere. I think it was from Machiavelli, but I don’t know for sure. So I’ll just rewrite it and call it my own:

“It not WHO they talk about that’s in charge, but who they DON’T talk about, that are the real powers that be.”

Just who don’t they talk about? If you simply watch TV (woe unto you), read between the lines a little and make mental notes on what they seem willing to discuss and what they don’t; you can get some sense of it. Make note how they slander any racially awakened Whites, White patriot communities of any sort, or use tin-foil hat ridicule tactics on left-winger, but still PC 9/11 truthers, since they might get too close to the real deal. Which, ironically enough, is the true raison d’être behind “PC” in the first place.

Be sure to read the rest Here

The Fed Trades Counterfeit Money for POWER!

If you could COUNTERFEIT would you try to keep that power? Would you become tyrannic? The FEDeral Reserve trades counterfeit money for power.
How much corruption could you cause if you could legally counterfeit? Could you make and break politicians? Could you buy up Media conglomerates? Direct talking heads to omit certain subjects? Fund Non-profit Institutions? Fund the Communist and Fascist leaders for eventual war profiteering and tyrannic domestic control. Hype terrorist threats to foment war and police state control?
truthbomb1

From: “Secrets of the Federal Reserve” by Eustace Mullins

“Our financial system is a false one and a huge burden on the people . . . This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth.” — Congressman Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Sr.

The shareholders of these banks which own the stock of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York are the people who have controlled our political and economic destinies since 1914.

They are the Rothschilds of Europe, Lazard Freres (Eugene Meyer), Kuhn Loeb Company, Warburg Company, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, the Rockefeller family, and the J.P. Morgan interests. {more}

So the criminal banks that get the bailouts and are making profits from the economic destruction are the owners of the Federal Reserve?

The problem with a return to the gold standard is "who is in possession of the vast majority of the gold reserves?" Maybe the same banks that are committing the fraud today? Since all of the power and money were stolen, I suppose the only option is to take it back.
Easier said than done.

"9/11 Truth" and its role in the game

By Matthew D. Jarvie
July 14, 2009
Dissecting the New Age


In April of last year I wrote an article that questioned the motives of a UN official who went public calling for a new investigation into the "neocons' role in 9/11." The person I am referring to is Richard Falk, who, as I stated in the aforementioned article, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations as well as the World Federalist Society. Richard Falk was also a leading contributor to the globalist World Order Models Project, financed by the Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Endowment in the 1970's, which was a report that suggested "strategies of transition" into a new global era. On top of this, Falk has published numerous books with titles such as Toward a Just World Order (1982) and The United Nations and a Just World Order (1991), calling for global governance.

Falk is perhaps best known to some for having written the foreword to David Ray Griffin's 2004 book, The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11. This book played a crucial role in the rise of the 9/11 Truth Movement, and is perhaps the most widely sold book on the subject. The book quickly made its way on to the shelves of every major bookstore and even most libraries across the US and much of the world. Following the publication of Griffin's book, he was given a 90-minute time slot on C-SPAN in April of '05 to air his findings and promote his book.

While I have found much of Griffin's information on 9/11 to be quite good, I found it suspicious that he was so adamant on placing the blame for an inside job almost entirely on the Bush administration. Certainly anyone who has even slight knowledge regarding government black-ops knows they go much higher than the puppetocracy of the White House.

My suspicions about Griffin were further confirmed when I stumbled upon this YouTube clip of him saying we need global governance to solve our problems.

Globalists for "9/11 Truth"

In the past year and a half, other UN officials have come forward calling for a "new investigation" into 9/11. In March, 2008, Japanese Member of Parliament, Yukihisa Fujita, stated on a nationally syndicated radio show that a new investigation into 9/11 could be lead by global parliamentarians or the United Nations itself, according to people he has been in contact with. This came less than a month after the EU parliament in Brussels held a "9/11 Truth" conference. As you can see from this video, New World Order minion David Ray Griffin sat on the panel at this conference.

Clearly the globalists have a stake in the 9/11 Truth Movement and are using it to further an agenda that is apparently unbeknownst to the majority of the movement.

You would think that what I mentioned above would warrant enough suspicion from people to attract more attention to this issue than it's receiving, which is almost no attention at all. Why is this? Part of it is because many who claim to have "woken up" still have their heads buried in the sand. They don't think because they depend on their authorized "leaders" to tell them everything, and certainly the big names in this so-called "movement" (which I do NOT belong to) are not talking about it. This makes them no better than the sheeple they condemn, who make a steady diet of CNN and FOX News, relying on these corporate news outlets to provide them all their information, never taking the time and effort to think for themselves and ask if maybe they're being duped.

It is quite obvious that the powers that be, who engineered the attacks of September 11th, are not afraid of "the truth" getting out, as long as it's the authorized version of the truth peddled by people like David Ray Griffin and the charlatans in the "alternative" media that give them airtime. No, they control the 9/11 "Truth" Movement, "Patriot" Movement, and the sorry excuses for "leaders" they have leading people back into the sheep pen from which they emerged. If these so-called leaders are not being controlled directly, they are certainly being promoted for a reason that has nothing to do with "defeating the New World Order."

Corporate media whores for "9/11 Truth"

Does anyone ever stop to ask themselves why the media is so willing to give coverage to the conspiratorial version of events surrounding 9/11? Yeah, there definitely is substance to the notion that they bring the truth out in to the open so they can marginalize and discredit it. After all, the truth is always much safer for the PTB when it's in plain sight than lurking in the shadows. But like all things under this system, the media, too, works according to the Hegelian dialectic. While on one hand they will attack and ridicule any alternative views on 9/11, they also will give airtime to very prominent and "credible" people who will give legitimacy to this version of events in certain people's eyes. This way they can bring it out into the public view in a way that will draw people in, while at the same time associating it with kookery, so they can play one side (the believers, aka "conspiracy theorists") off the other side (the non-believers), so there is never any true awakening on a mass scale.

There is no doubt that 9/11 Truth would not be nearly as big as it is without the mainstream-corporate media's help. The Truth Movement seems to really have gained momentum since sitcom actor Charlie Sheen appeared on The Alex Jones Show to share his views regarding what happened on 9/11 back in 2006. This triggered a firestorm of mainstream media attention to Sheen's comments and landed Jones an appearance on CNN's Showbiz Tonight, marking the first widespread coverage of 9/11 Truth in the televised media. A few months after this, in June, 2006, the American Scholars Symposium was held in Los Angeles. Its panel consisted of 9/11 researchers, hosted by Alex Jones and featuring names like Webster Tarpley, Stephen Jones, Jim Fetzer and Col. Bob Bowman. Charlie Sheen also spoke at this event. This event, too, was given hours of airtime by C-SPAN. C-SPAN's companion news website, Capital News, later stated that the conference was their most popular program ever aired. C-SPAN touts itself as being independent from the corporate media monopoly and therefore a source of unbiased news and information. Its founder, Brian Lamb, in an interview, states that C-SPAN "in effect is not owned by anybody, but is controlled by a board of directors made up of some 21 people." However, once you look at the list of these 21 people, you see it consists of names from Time-Warner, Comcast Communications, Adelphia Communications, Columbia Partners and others. Ultimately it's these people who decide what gets aired and what doesn't. The notion that C-SPAN is an independent media outlet is a crock.

9/11 Truth to futher the NWO agenda

I believe that the cover will be blown off 9/11 eventually, and probably sooner than later. However, it will not be blown in a way that exposes the true criminals or exposes the New World Order for what it truly is. Instead it will be used to usher in the New World Order by creating the pretext to offer an "international solution" to a demoralized and disillusioned public, under the guise that the American government is broken and cannot be fixed. This is why people from the UN and EU have taken such an interest in 9/11. It's all about creating a pretext for increased internationalism to solve the problems the internationalists themselves created. Bush and Cheney -- who are no doubt criminals and mass-murderers of the worst kind, but still low-level frontmen -- will be used as the scapegoats, while the real criminals not only remain unpunished but will reap the rewards of the atrocity they were responsible for.

Just last week it was announced that Barack Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, is considering appointing a criminal prosecutor to investigate abuses involving torture during the Bush administration's tenure. There has been much talk in recent months of Bush and Cheney being put on trial before an international tribunal. Could this possibly evolve into an exposé of Bush and Cheney for their role in the 9/11 attacks? I think this is not only possible, but probable.

As Barack Obama continues to become less and less popular, as he works to gut what's left of the US economy and move us ever closer toward unabashed socialism, it is only a matter of time before he experiences a backlash from the public once they realize they've been sold up the river. I believe it is possible that the Obama administration, with help from the international community, could pull a trick out of the bag and expose Bush, Cheney and others in the Bush administration for their involvement in 9/11 (and therefore the collapse of the economy and everything else that has happened since then). This would not only redirect the public's anger away from Obama, but it would give him impetus to further push his sovereignty-eroding agenda and bring the United States fully into the hands of global governance.

"We need a new investigation into 9/11" = sheeplike group-think

Those reading this who believe a "new investigation" into 9/11 is needed must realize that there can be no such thing. The people who carried out these attacks at the highest levels control this system lock, stock and barrel. Any investigation into 9/11, no matter how independent it appears to be, will still be controlled and steered by "them," for an agenda that is to their benefit only.

The amount of group-think and lack of critical thought prevalent among people who claim to be "awake" frightens me. These people will get behind their sellout leaders and shout slogans all day about how there needs to be a new investigation into 9/11, never asking themselves what that really means or would entail.

It is obvious to anyone who has researched 9/11 that it was a massive hoax perpetrated on the people of the world. I know what happened that day isn't what the "official story" would have us believe and I can accept that. I don't need a new investigation to tell me what I already know, and the notion that it will bring those responsible for this atrocity to justice is a pipe dream.

What people should be questioning are those big names in the "Truth" Movement, who claim to be against the New World Order, yet promote and give credence to people who clearly want to use 9/11 to forward a globalist agenda.

Source: Matthew D. Jarvie

Are You Under....the Power of Gold?

United Future World Currency

Fed Quotes

“The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it's profits or so dependent on it's favors, that there will be no opposition from that class.” - Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

“The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers.” - Congressman Louis T. McFadden (speaking in the Senate)

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers." - Congressional Record 12595-12603 - Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency, June 10, 1932

"From now on, depressions will be scientifically created." - Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." - Henry Ford

"I have never seen more Senators express discontent with their jobs....I think the major cause is that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices in doing something terrible and unforgivable to our wonderful country. Deep down in our heart, we know that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. We have defrauded our country to get ourselves elected." - John Danforth (R-Mo)

"By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft." - John Maynard Keynes

"The modern Banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banks can in fact inflate, mint and unmint the modern ledger-entry currency." - Major L .L. B. Angus

"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws." - Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

There's something about this song that disturbs you.

Dan Fogelberg & Tim Weisburg