A. Is the USA powerless against the BRICS - the 'alliance' of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa?
Are the Rothschilds and Rockefellers powerless against the BRICS?
B. We assume that China can be put under pressure by the 'organisation' of riots (Chinese riots enter third day).
And India 'kept under control' by people such as 'CIA agent' David Headley.
Perhaps India and China can be persuaded to go to war against each other, thus weakening both?
China is backing Pakistan which is a rival to India. (If India and Pakistan Come to Nuclear Blows, Blame US: Mishra)
Presumably some of the top people in the BRICS already work for the CIA and its friends. ("KASAB WAS INTERROGATED BY HEADLEY")
Note Russia's opposition to Gaddafi. (Russia urges Gaddafi's departure, offers aid to opposition)
C. On 15 June 2011, Russia's General Leonid Ivashov wrote an article entitled BRICS and the Mission of Reconfiguring the World
Ivashov points out:
1. Countries which defy the USA, and defy dollar dominance, tend to be attacked by the USA.
Think of Saddam Hussein's Iraq and Gaddafi's Libya.
2. However, "the financial empires built by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are powerless against the BRICS."
The BRICS account for nearly half of the world’s population.
Three of them are nuclear-armed.
BRICS "do not appear vulnerable to colour revolutions or to the strategy of provoking and exporting financial crises."
BRICS own vast natural resources.
3. In April 20011, a BRICS summit denounced the use of force against Libya.
4. BRICS should link with Iran, Syria, Malaysia, and Turkey.
There should be a BRICS common market.
And a BRICS shared security framework.
5. Two processes are going on.
On the one hand, attempts are being made to establish a 'world government', run by the 'main financial empires'.
To help achieve this, various crises, armed conflicts, and calamities are provoked.
On the other hand, an alternative world order is increasingly visible - BRICS, along with its potential partner the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.
~~
Anonymous left this comment:
Ian Crane shares some ideas about why he thinks Japan was targeted.
"Statement by the Press Secretary, Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Japan, on the situation in East Jerusalem, February 10, 20111.
The Government of Japan is concerned about the Jerusalem municipal planning committee’s approval of a plan to build housing units for Jewish people in the Sheih Jarrah of East Jerusalem.
Such act goes against the efforts by the international community to resume the negotiations.
2. The Government of Japan does not recognize any act that prejudges the final status of the territories in the pre-1967 borders nor Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem.
Japan urges Israel to refrain from any unilateral act that changes the current situation in East Jerusalem."
http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/announce/2011/2/0210_02.html [36:10]
He links Fukushima to the largest E.coli breakout, resistant to penicillin, in Germany.
It seems Germany has been keeping an eye on world events.
They've also been the forefront resistance against the EU's plan to use GM crops.
Now they're shutting down pre 1980 nuclear plants and winding down the nuclear program.
Has biological warfare been released upon Germany?
Germany and Japan have both voted against Israel. Germany for the first time.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2011/06/RIR-110616-icrane.mp3
